Khun Kong Peaberry Roast #2: When Second Crack Surprises Me

Armed with baseline data from my 350g test roast, I approached the second Khun Kong Peaberry session with confidence. I had a plan, I had targets, and I had 650 grams ready to become a balanced medium roast showcasing citrus brightness and caramel sweetness. The roast had other ideas.

Khun Kong Peaberry to the chrage
Khun Kong Peaberry to the chrage

The Game Plan

Based on my first roast’s bean temperature (BT) data, I mapped out a profile designed to extract Khun Kong’s best qualities:

Target Timeline:

  • Dry End (DE): 5 minutes 30 seconds @ 154ยฐC – moderate pace to preserve acidity
  • First Crack (FC): 11 minutes @ 183ยฐC – extended 5min 30sec Maillard phase for caramel development
  • Development Time: 3 minutes post-FC
  • Drop Temperature: 199ยฐC – aiming for classic medium roast

The strategy was sound: hit DE on schedule to maintain citrus notes, give plenty of Maillard time for sweetness complexity, then develop conservatively through first crack for a balanced cup. Total roast time: approximately 14 minutes.

What Actually Happened

The roast started promising. At 5 minutes 24 seconds, I nearly perfectly hit 154ยฐC for dry endโ€”just six seconds ahead of plan. Success, right?

Then everything accelerated.

Actual Timeline:

  • Dry End: 5:24 @ 154ยฐC โœ“ (on target)
  • First Crack: 7:54 @ 183ยฐC โœ— (2min 30sec Maillard, not 5min 30sec)
  • Heard Second Crack: ~194ยฐC
  • Drop: 196ยฐC (3 seconds early from plan)

Instead of my planned leisurely 5.5-minute Maillard phase, the beans sprinted through in just 2.5 minutes. I found myself scrambling to adjust development time, but the damage was doneโ€”the momentum was irreversible.

The Second Crack Revelation

Here’s where my first roast data betrayed me. I had logged incorrect second crack (SC) temperatures during the baseline roast, which threw off my entire reference framework.

At approximately 194ยฐC, I heard what sounded like second crack beginning. Panic mode. I wasn’t supposed to be near SC yetโ€”I had planned to drop at 199ยฐC for medium roast. I dropped at 196ยฐC, thinking I was being conservative and preventing a dark roast.

The beans told a different story after cooling. Despite dropping “early,” they exhibited clear dark roast characteristicsโ€”well past the medium profile I’d targeted.

The conclusion? Second crack actually starts around 195ยฐC for Khun Kong Peaberry, not wherever I’d incorrectly noted in roast #1.

The Kaleido M6 Audio Challenge

This experience exposed a limitation I hadn’t fully appreciated: the Kaleido M6’s sound dynamics. Between the drum rotation noise and what seems like decent soundproofing (probably for safety and user comfort), hearing crack progression clearly is challenging.

Even first crack at 183ยฐC sounded faint to meโ€”almost questionable. Was that crack, or just beans tumbling? Second crack was similarly subtle until it became unmistakable, by which point the beans were already well into the transition.

For visual roasters accustomed to Aillio Bullets or other machines where crack sounds are crisp and obvious, the M6 requires adaptation. I need to rely more heavily on:

  • Temperature markers
  • Time elapsed
  • Visual cues through the sight glass
  • Perhaps even smell changes

Depending primarily on audio cues clearly isn’t reliable with this machine.

Lessons for next Roast

Two critical adjustments needed:

  1. Correct SC baseline: Second crack begins around 195ยฐC, not my previously recorded (incorrect) temperature. This means my “safe” drop zone for medium roast is probably 191-193ยฐC, not 196-199ยฐC. (other roaster machine have the BT record for second crack are around 215ยฐC, it just the Kaleido are different)
  2. Control the Maillard rush: That 2min 30sec sprint through Maillard versus my planned 5min 30sec suggests I didn’t reduce heat aggressively enough after DE. The M6’s thermal momentum carried the beans faster than anticipated.

The gap between 5:24 DE and 7:54 FC means heat was being applied too aggressively during the Maillard phase. I need earlier, more significant heat reduction immediately after dry end to slow that development and build the sweetness complexity this bean promises.

When Data Lies

This roast reinforced an uncomfortable truth: garbage data in, garbage plan out. My first roast’s incorrect SC temperature sent me into roast #2 with false confidence. I thought I understood the bean’s thermal behaviorโ€”I didn’t.

The positive spin? Now I actually do. Khun Kong Peaberry has revealed its true temperature personality. The next roast will benefit from accurate benchmarks and a healthy respect for how quickly this bean can run away from you in the Maillard phase.

Hope I will get a real Medium roast, but in different bean, coming soon.

Roast Status: Dark roast (unintended)
Key Discovery: SC @ ~195ยฐC
Next Action: Aggressive heat reduction post-DE, drop @ 191-193ยฐC


Roast Profile:

  • DE: 5:24 @ 154ยฐC
  • FC: 7:54 @ 183ยฐC
  • SC (heard): ~194ยฐC
  • Drop: 196ยฐC
  • Maillard Time: 2:30 (planned 5:30)
  • Development: ~2:06

Khum Kong Peabearry Second Roast Sample


Feel free to request a sample if youโ€™d like to try this second roast. Itโ€™s not perfect, but who knows – you might like it.

Khun Kong Peaberry Second Roast Sample
Khun Kong Peaberry Second Roast Sample

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *